Well, PyCon 2012 has come and gone. It was fantastic to see everyone and to learn new things. For me, I think the big takeaway from the conference was all of the activity surrounding scientific computing and data analysis. The ipython notebook project is really quite amazing--I will need to spend more time checking that out. As a former stats geek, I'm also quite interested in checking out pandas. Last, but not least, I really enjoyed chairing the session on GIS tools. I have taken a recent interest in GIS and mapping, but quickly realized that I was way out of my element with it. The talks were a nice way to connect with some of the tools and techniques involved.
In my keynote talk on PyPy, I somehow managed to cover 123 presentation slides with 2 minutes to spare. Vern Ceder then noted that I now owe everyone an extra 5.72 slides. So, without further delay, here are the 5.72 extra things I wish I could have included in my PyPy Keynote:
In Guido's keynote talk, he talked about feeding trolls and at one point mentioned the GIL. Having done a lot of past work trying to understand the GIL, I'd like to say a few words about that. First of all, if you think that my primary interest in the GIL is to show how Python threads (or Python itself) suck, then you would be wrong. You will not find either claim in any of that work nor will you find me online engaging in discussion about such things.
The truth of the matter is that threads are my preferred means of concurrent programming in Python. Not only that, they work extremely well for all sorts of problems involving I/O. However, if you're going to program with threads, it's important to be aware of situations where they do not work as well. In the case of Python, this mostly pertains to programs that try to subdivide computation across threads. There are also potential issues with code that overlaps heavy computation with background I/O handling. Thus, my main interest in the GIL has been to explore some of these corner cases in some detail with an eye towards improving the GIL implementation--something that I consider to be a worthy goal. More generally, I think the GIL is interesting to study as a systems programming puzzle on its own.
In any case, the performance of threads is highly specific to the application at hand. You can't just take some benchmark from one of my GIL talks and extrapolate that out to a general statement about all Python thread programming. Personally, I find that Python threads have worked pretty well for most of the problems where I've used them. Of course your mileage might vary.
Last, but not least, I never should have gone to Jason Huggins's talk about the robot that plays Angry Birds. I have now become that robot when I should be working on my concurrency workshop. Argh!
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
08/01/2009 - 09/01/2009 09/01/2009 - 10/01/2009 10/01/2009 - 11/01/2009 11/01/2009 - 12/01/2009 12/01/2009 - 01/01/2010 01/01/2010 - 02/01/2010 02/01/2010 - 03/01/2010 04/01/2010 - 05/01/2010 05/01/2010 - 06/01/2010 07/01/2010 - 08/01/2010 08/01/2010 - 09/01/2010 09/01/2010 - 10/01/2010 12/01/2010 - 01/01/2011 01/01/2011 - 02/01/2011 02/01/2011 - 03/01/2011 03/01/2011 - 04/01/2011 04/01/2011 - 05/01/2011 05/01/2011 - 06/01/2011 08/01/2011 - 09/01/2011 09/01/2011 - 10/01/2011 12/01/2011 - 01/01/2012 01/01/2012 - 02/01/2012 02/01/2012 - 03/01/2012 03/01/2012 - 04/01/2012 07/01/2012 - 08/01/2012 01/01/2013 - 02/01/2013 03/01/2013 - 04/01/2013 06/01/2014 - 07/01/2014
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]